Electrical regulator.



v c. A. MOORE. ELECTRICAL REGULATOR.

- APPLICATION FILED MAY17, 1911.

1,1 17,689, Patented Nov. 17, 1914.

I LA 7) T w j F J I b I 5 [NI 151V TOR.

vplished by changing the current increases, the

CHARLES A. MOORE, OF JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.

ELECTRICAL REGULATOR.

To all whom it may concern:

Be it known that I, CHARLES A. Moons, a citizen of the United States, residing in the city of Johnstown, in the county of Cambria and- State of Pennsylvania, have invented power plant.

Its object is to cause a given variation in load to have a constant eifective value to produce regulation, regardless of the amount of the total load.v

With other regulators a given variation in load has a greater eflective value to produce regulation when the total load is small than when it is large. One reason for this is that the adjustment different total loads is frequently accomthe pulling strength of springs or weights.

It has been customary to regulate the load on the power plant generators by, varying the field 'stren" h of the booster or the ex citer for theboosterand by yaryingthe directionoffthe current in the fields. ofthe" "Thea bunt {of Variation has 'fbeelijj e governedby which is acted upon by the opposing forces L of an electromagnet and springs or weights,

the coils of themagnet beingin series with the main circuit.

The pull of the springs isjustbalanced by the pull exerted by the magnet when the.current flowing through the coils has a certain fixed strength. When armature is'pulled toward the magnet against the action of the springs or weights, and this motion ofthe armature, by means of suitable mechanism, varies the field strength of the booster in such a manner as to cause the storage*battery to discharge, thus brin ing the generator lea back to normal. owever, if the desired load on the generators is to be increased, it is necessary to increase the pull of the springs, as the pull of the electromagnet is also increased. It has been found that the spring, being under a greater tension, Will have a greater reaction or resist- Specification of Letters Patent. Application filed May 17, 1911.

for maintaining a constant load upon the electrical generators 'of a of these regulators tosuit' e motion o armature Patented Nov. 17, 1914.

Serial No. 627,699.

ance sothat avgiven increment of current will not be able to cause the armature to more through as great a distance and consequently, the regulator is not as sensitive when the generators-have a heavy' loa-d as it is when they have a light one. This has been found to be true even though the elastic limit of the spring is not exceeded. thermore the desired variation of generator load may be so great as to make it difiicult or impossible to provide a spring having t e requisite range. In case a weight is used in place of a spring, the weight must be in creased in proportion to the desired load, with the result that a given absolute fluctuation of current will have a proportionately smaller regulating effect as the desired normal load increases. I overcome-this defect by using a shunt coil or coils on the electromagnet in addition to the usual apparatus and provide means whereby the lines of force produced by these coils may be caused to aid or to oppose the lines of force produced by the series coil, as desired. I also provide means for varying the current passing through the shunt coils so as to regulate their effect on the electromagnet. Thus I am able to keep the stiffness of the spring a constant, so that a given change in our- Furrent will always move the armature the same Referring to the sheet of drawings forming apart of this specificatiomin which like reference indicate like parts 7 "throughout the views :Figure 1 is a diacharacters of grammatic' View of a wiring system showing a booster regulator embodying my. invention. Fig. 2 is an enlarged end view of the in Fig. 1, showing the electromagnet shown bus-bar in cross section and the shunt circuit diagrammatically. Fig. 3 is a side elevation of the apparatus shown in Fig. 2, the circuit bein omitted, and also shows suitable "means or opposing the pull of the electroma et.

In t e drawings, 1 and 2 indicate respectively the positive and negative bus-bars which receive the. current from the generators 3, and to which the various elements of the load 4 are connected. The U-shaped member 5, preferably of soft iron orsteel capable of being as mounted on the bus-bar .1, being sepashould be understood that, so far as the easily magnetized, isshown rated therefrom by the'insulation 6, but it..

. operate in such a member 5 is concerned, the bus-bar may be replaced by a coil in series with the main circuit Without affecting the action of the apparatus. The bus-bar, or the series coil, whichever is used, acts as a winding to make an electromagnet of the member 5.

The current in the main circuit magnetizes the member 5 and causes it to attractthe armature 7, opposing the force exerted upon the latter by the spring 8. The pull of the spring may be regulated by any suitable means such as indicated by 9. The levers 10 and 11, the shaft 12 and the rod 13 transmit the pull of the spring to the armature. The beam 14 is attached to the shaft 12, consequently any motion of the armature causes a corresponding angular motion of the beam.

The contacts 15 and 16 are mounted on beam 14: so that as the beam is tilted, one or the other-of these contacts is, plunged into mercury in the cups 17. The fingers or points in each of the contacts are connected by the variable resistance 18 and are of different lengths so that they-enter the mercury one at a time, thereby gradually shortcircuiting the resistance. The contacts are both connected to the field 19 of the exciter 20 which controls the field 21 of the booster 22. The booster is connected across the bus-bars in series with the storage battery 23. The exciter field is preferably connected to the middle of the storage battery, and the contacts 15 and 16 are connected to the bus-bars 1 and 2 respectively. The resistance in the two circuits is such that when the beam 14: is in its middle position the two contacts have the same potential and the exciter field coils do not receive any current. Then if the current in the main circuit starts to increase, the armature 7 is pulled toward the magnet, thus plunging some of the points of contact 15 into the mercury and cutting out resistance in that circuit so that current will flow from bus bar 1 through contact 15 and exciter field 19 to the battery. This causes the booster to manner that the battery will discharge, and the load on the generators will be reduced to normal. Should the current start to drop, the spring 8 will pull the. armature away from the magnet, thereby plunging contact 16 into the mercury and causing current to flow from the battery through the exciter field 19 and contact 16 to bus-bar 2, thus reversing the booster and causing the battery to charge so as to hold the load on the generators up to normal.

The above apparatus is but one of many to which my invention may be applied.

My invention consists principally in the use of a shunt coil or coils which I shall now describe -The shunt coils 24: are mounted on the member Band are connected by means of the wires 25, to the bus-bars. The rheostat 26 permits the resistance of this circuit to be varied as desired, and the switch 27 is arranged so that the current in the shunt coils may be reversed. Thus the position of switch 27 determines whether the coils 24 are to aid or to'oppose the bus-bar in magnetizing the member 5, and the rheostat 26 regulates the amount of such aid or opposition as the case may be. Assuming that the spring has been regulated to balance the magnet pull corresponding to a given current strength in the main circuit, then, if the desired total load on the generators is to be increased, I connect the shunt coils differentially with the bus-bar and vary the resistance in the shunt circuit until the effect of the additional current strength in the bus-bar is neutralized. The magnet then exerts the same pull on the armature as it did under the original conditions, so that the pull of the spring does not have to be changed. When the load on the generators is to be smaller than that for which the spring was set, I connect the shunt coils comulatively with the bus-bar and regulate the resistance in the shunt circuit until the pull of the magnet iust balances that of the spring. Thus it will be seen that, in my invention, the spring is set to balance the magnet pull corresponding to a certain current in the main circuit. and that, whenever this current is to be changed, the shunt coils are used to neutralize the change in magnetic strength caused by the change in current, so that the pull of the spring may remain constant.

The above describes the application of my invention to booster-regulators for power systems in which a storage battery is emploved to equalize the load. In such distribution systems the electric energy is supplied at constant potential and it results that the electromotive force across the terminals of the shunt containing coils 24- remains constant. In other words, the shunt is in this case a source of constant current, adiustable by the rbeostat 26. and may be replaced by any other suitable source of constant current. In fact. if the invention is to be applied to a system in which the vo tage does not remain constant, it is not sufiicient to place the neutralizing coi s 24 in a simple shunt as above described. They must, in that case, be supplied with a constant adjustable current from some other source.

When I speak of varying the resistance ofthe shunt circuit whenever the load on the generators is to be different from that for which the spring was set, I do not refer to any mere fluctuations, as the booster and storage battery are provided for the purpose of taking care of these, as will be understood by those skilled in the art.

Although I have shown and described my invention in considerable detail, I do not wish to be limited to the exact and specific details shown and described, but may use such substitutions, modifications or equivalents thereof as are embraced Within the scope of my invention, or as pointed out in the Claim-5f Haw ing thugdescrlbed my invention, what I claim and desire to secure by Letters Patient is:

In a regulator for electric supply systems, an electromagnet provided with an armature subjected to a retractive force, said electromagnet having an exciting winding carrying current Copies of this patent he obtained for five cents each,

the system to beregulated, an additional winding on the magnet, and connections, including an adjustable rheostat and a reversing switch, for supplying current to said additional winding to neutralize the effect of predetermined variations in the. normal conditions of the system and thereby render the effective regulating value of a given fluctuation substantially independent of such predeter-- mined variations.

In testimony whereof I hereto afiix my signature in the'presence of two witnesses. CHARLES A. MOORE.

Witnesses:

ELMER SEAVEY, ROBERT A. Beans.

by addressing the 0omm"doner of Patents.

Washington, D. 0. 

